View Single Post
TattooedMac

 
TattooedMac's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 19, 2009
Location: Waiting for a mate . . .
Posts: 7,730
TattooedMac has a brilliant futureTattooedMac has a brilliant futureTattooedMac has a brilliant futureTattooedMac has a brilliant futureTattooedMac has a brilliant futureTattooedMac has a brilliant futureTattooedMac has a brilliant futureTattooedMac has a brilliant futureTattooedMac has a brilliant futureTattooedMac has a brilliant futureTattooedMac has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: 21" iMac 2.9Ghz 10.9.4 13"MBP 2.9Ghz i7 Yosemite 10.10 ~ iPhone5 iOS 8 ~ iPad Mini iOS 8 ~ ATV3 6.1

TattooedMac is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by markst33 View Post
Hi there. I am thinking of buying my very first iMac and I am looking at the 21" version. Here in Ireland there is 200 difference between the 2.7 ghz and the 2.9 versions.

So what do you think ? Save the 200 and put it towards the cost of Photoshop, or would you recommend spending the 200 and getting the 2.9 version.

Mark S.
Well to me 200 Euro is well worth the difference in the 2, especially after looking at the geekbench scores Nick provided, then again the 200 difference might not be to the next person. We are all different. What you need to work out is if you could afford 400 Euro 200 for the 2.9 upgrade and then the 200 towards Photoshop.
Just for FYI 2.7 is well good enough for anything you want to do. I used to have a 2.4 MBP running PS CS5 and a lot of other running Apps with 4GB RAM and i had no problems...

CogFrog Studio's ~ Photography, Apps and Web Development
Dont forget to use the Reputation System if someone has helped you out !!!
Arguing with a zealot is only slightly easier than tunneling through a mountain with your forehead!!!!!
QUOTE Thanks