- Joined
- May 31, 2007
- Messages
- 987
- Reaction score
- 22
- Points
- 18
- Location
- Miami, Fl
- Your Mac's Specs
- IMAC / Powerbook / Ipad 3
Simple. Money... huge piles of money. They're going to shoot them simultaneously. Actually, it will probably be just one schedule. Then when it comes time to edit, they will split it into two movies there.Wow, good to hear. Just wonder why it has to be made into two movies.
Simple. Money... huge piles of money. They're going to shoot them simultaneously. Actually, it will probably be just one schedule. Then when it comes time to edit, they will split it into two movies there.
So.....They make two movies, you pay to see both in the theater. They get twice the admission cost that way.
Then you pay for both of the DVD's when they come out. They get twice the price of the DVD then.
Later on, they release a boxed-set of all the movies with "extra" features. You buy them again. They get even more money.
Yes,... soul-crushing piles of money. That is why they are making it into two movies. Because people are crazy enough to pay for it.
Yeah, me too. Sad, but nevertheless true.To be honest, that really annoys me. It's nothing but simple greed....
They were much longer in literary form than The Hobbit, yet those three books all made it to one movie each.Sure, it annoys me, but if they put the whole thing in one, it might miss a lot of stuff that's really essential... unless they made a 6 hour long movie...
They were much longer in literary form than The Hobbit, yet those three books all made it to one movie each.
You aren't going to 'miss' anything, nor have the need to make the movie 6 hours long. Besides, no movie based on a book has ever been pinpoint accurate to the written page.