- Joined
- Mar 30, 2005
- Messages
- 9,571
- Reaction score
- 25
- Points
- 48
So, I didn't really know what "right to work" meant and it implied that employees had a right to work with some sort of state guarantee (and consequently, something that doesn't necessarily benefit employers). That is probably the most misleading name for a piece of legislation possible. Sure, it does guarantee some rights but the name is so odd.Apple already has facilities in Austin. And, as you know it's smart business to locate in a state that has no state tax and a "right to work" law.
Good question Van. The "Right to Work" laws that some states have mean that the worker or employee does not have to join a union in order to work. States that do not have that law require the employee or worker to join a union in order to work, or, at the very least pay union dues if they decide not to join. Very unfair in my opinion and for the most part strictly political. Texas is a state that has a "Right to Work" law, and we have no state imposed income tax. We do have a sales tax, however.
My understanding is that it will be the iMac? Anyone heard anything different?