- Joined
- Oct 10, 2004
- Messages
- 10,345
- Reaction score
- 597
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Margaritaville
- Your Mac's Specs
- 3.4 Ghz i7 MacBook Pro (2015), iPad Pro (2014), iPhone Xs Max. Apple TV 4K
Best thing is, keep it clean, and you will have nothing to fear. They look and find nothing, they can do nothing.
Not the point.
the right to privacy is and has always been an illusion.
it's really only recently that we've started tho think we could have some. historically, it's an anomaly.
this isn't surprising, really.
Not the point.
In this day and age, it is the point. You have no real privacy in life. It was given up for safety, and a safer environment. Oh, and once you gave it up, you can't get it back.
*Sub-note*
You are watched everyday in this life. From tracking programs on-line to cameras watching you drive down the street, to security cameras watching you in stores and what you buy.
That's just like the government for ya, one minute you're in the most free nation in the world and the
HEY! LET GO OF ME!
I didn't do anything wrong! I was just voicing my opinion!
HEY! LET G-
Sorry folks, this is Agent Visnaw from the FBI. Derek here was attempting to share his opinion in a public forum.
You don't have to worry about those kind of shenannigans anymore.
Have a great, safe day!
All it takes is a court order. So yes, a judge has every right to do this.Does even a judge have the right to do this? Surely YouTube holds data on users from all over the world and each country has their own data protection laws - is the grounds for this because the server where the data is being stored is in the US?
In this day and age, it is the point. You have no real privacy in life. It was given up for safety, and a safer environment. Oh, and once you gave it up, you can't get it back.
*Sub-note*
You are watched everyday in this life. From tracking programs on-line to cameras watching you drive down the street, to security cameras watching you in stores and what you buy.
I am looking for this joint article written by two sociology and political science professors that basically destroys the whole "if you do nothing wrong then you have nothing to fear" argument. Would you read it if I found it?
Plus, surveillance doesn't exactly equal a safer environment. You can't equate these two things because correlation is not causation, the number one rule of all social science study.