Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25
  1. #1
    Tim Cook angrily rejects political proposal asking for profits-first policies
    iggibar's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 20, 2009
    Location
    C-Town
    Posts
    4,071
    Specs:
    Mac Pro 4.1 15" MBP. 13" MBP. 17" PB. Power Mac G5. Galaxy Note 4 160gb*
    Tim Cook angrily rejects political proposal asking for profits-first policies
    Tim Cook Angrily Rejects Political Proposal Asking for Profits-First Policies - Mac Rumors

    Stick it to 'em Tim!
    "At today's annual meeting of Apple shareholders, Apple CEO Tim Cook informed investors that are primarily concerned with making reasonable economic returns that their money is no longer welcome."
    Way to lay the smackdown!
    “If you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself but to your own estimate of it; and this you have the power to revoke at any moment.” Marcus Aurelius

  2. #2
    Tim Cook angrily rejects political proposal asking for profits-first policies
    MacInWin's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 07, 2008
    Location
    Winchester, VA
    Posts
    4,297
    Specs:
    2011 MBP, 2008 iMac, iPhone 5S, iPad mini, 13" MBP and MacMini
    On the other hand, he has a responsibility to the people who loan the company money (stockholders) to do the things he wants to do. That's how the public market works. Doing a "smackdown" on his investors is NOT generally a good idea. Explaining to the investors why he is using their money the way he is using their money is a better approach, IMHO. Then any investor who is unhappy about his decisions can vote with their money.

  3. #3
    Tim Cook angrily rejects political proposal asking for profits-first policies
    Exodist's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 26, 2012
    Location
    Agusan del Norte, Philippines
    Posts
    1,022
    Specs:
    L2012 Mini, i7 2.6Ghz, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD + 1TB HDD(fusion), BenQ 32" 2.5k QHD Display
    Its not like Apple is going belly up.. They are turning a profit more now then ever. Sounds like just had some shareholders wanting to squeeze another penny instead of wanting to let Tim future proof the company with more investments and research & development. His job is to make sure the company continues to run day after day and year after year while still making a profit. Most stockholders would assume to invest today, get their profit tomorrow and pull out. Letting the company fall to the ground while they move onto the next big investment.

    Joe's Photo & Video Blog on YouTube
    Lightroom, Photoshop, FCP, Gear Reviews and more...
    ***If someone helps you, please don't forget to use the reputation system.***

  4. #4
    Tim Cook angrily rejects political proposal asking for profits-first policies
    bobtomay's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 22, 2006
    Location
    Texas, where else?
    Posts
    26,206
    Specs:
    15" MBP '06 2.33 C2D 4GB 10.7; 13" MBA '11 1.8 i7 4GB 10.10; 21" iMac '13 2.9 i5 8GB 10.10; 5s & 5c
    And while we're at it, lets just go back to the days when no such thing as a middle class existed either. I'm just about as conservative as they come politically, but even I would not consider going back to the place the NCPPR would have us go. You don't have to be a liberal to realize that group has no soul.
    I cannot be held responsible for the things that come out of my mouth.
    In the Windows world, most everything folks don't understand is called a virus.

  5. #5
    Tim Cook angrily rejects political proposal asking for profits-first policies
    vansmith's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 19, 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    19,395
    Specs:
    2012 13" MBP (2.5 i5, 8GB)
    I don't actually believe that Apple doesn't put profits first (they're a business after all with a huge profit margin) but I do believe that they do put other things first before massive profits some of the time. Then again, at least they believe in climate change, something that "think tank" decided was worthy of quotation marks as if it wasn't real. I'm going to warn you - if you value your brain, tread lightly.

    The first line of that press release gets me:
    At today's annual meeting of Apple shareholders in Cupertino, California, Apple CEO Tim Cook informed investors that are primarily concerned with making reasonable economic returns that their money is no longer welcome.
    Evidently, this person doesn't realize that Apple very much is concerned with making returns on their investments and distribution. How could you make that conclusion about a company that sells goods for a pretty penny?

    My favourite part though is this:
    The National Center's shareholder resolution noted that "[s]ome trade associations and business organizations have expanded beyond the promotion of traditional business goals and are lobbying business executives to pursue objectives with primarily social benefits. This may affect Company profitability and shareholder value."
    Oh no, wouldn't want to care about people now would we? This statement is nothing short of violent - pursuing profits to the discrediting of work done to help social causes.
    Important Links: Community Guidelines : Use the reputation system if you've been helped.
    M-F Blog :: Write for the blog
    Writing a Quality Post

  6. #6
    Tim Cook angrily rejects political proposal asking for profits-first policies
    Lifeisabeach's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 30, 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Neptune
    Posts
    7,637
    IMO, I think Apple really needs to buy back all of their stock and go private. Hungry wolves have their eyes on Apple and if like-minded people do manage to get a majority share of the company in time, they will put in place whoever they want so they can sacrifice the company's core values and squeeze everything they can out of it. This is a sad trend, but vulture capitalism is a big problem today. Just look at what happened to Hostess.

    @ MacInWin

    I think Apple also has the right to tell shareholders that they don't want their money, or they should have the right anyway in principle. Besides, judging from a vote on the matter, 97+% of the shareholders agree with Tim Cook. It's probably worth mentioning that hardly any of these people actually loaned money to Apple. That money was loaned out many years ago by others, and the stock is just traded as a commodity these days. If I understand this all correctly, anyway.

  7. #7
    Tim Cook angrily rejects political proposal asking for profits-first policies
    bobtomay's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 22, 2006
    Location
    Texas, where else?
    Posts
    26,206
    Specs:
    15" MBP '06 2.33 C2D 4GB 10.7; 13" MBA '11 1.8 i7 4GB 10.10; 21" iMac '13 2.9 i5 8GB 10.10; 5s & 5c
    Quote Originally Posted by lifeisabeach View Post
    ... That money was loaned out many years ago by others, and the stock is just traded as a commodity these days. If I understand this all correctly, anyway.
    10-4

    Apple has never seen a penny from the pocket of that group of "investors".
    I cannot be held responsible for the things that come out of my mouth.
    In the Windows world, most everything folks don't understand is called a virus.

  8. #8
    Tim Cook angrily rejects political proposal asking for profits-first policies
    harryb2448's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 28, 2007
    Location
    Nambucca Heads Australia
    Posts
    20,020
    Specs:
    iMac i5 2.7GHz, 16GB memory, OS 10.10.5
    As a shareholder I agree with Cook 100%. Put some money in during the 'dark days' back in 1999 and any return has to be worth the risk.
    Hang on to those original install discs like grim death! Using OS X.7 or later make a bootable USB thumb drive before running Installer!

  9. #9
    Tim Cook angrily rejects political proposal asking for profits-first policies
    Exodist's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 26, 2012
    Location
    Agusan del Norte, Philippines
    Posts
    1,022
    Specs:
    L2012 Mini, i7 2.6Ghz, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD + 1TB HDD(fusion), BenQ 32" 2.5k QHD Display
    Quote Originally Posted by vansmith View Post
    I don't actually believe that Apple doesn't put profits first ...
    Someone would be mad to think otherwise. But making sure company continues to turn a profit for years to come -vs- turning a huge profit for a year then bottom up is more important. But some people just want to see it all burn I guess...

    Joe's Photo & Video Blog on YouTube
    Lightroom, Photoshop, FCP, Gear Reviews and more...
    ***If someone helps you, please don't forget to use the reputation system.***

  10. #10
    Tim Cook angrily rejects political proposal asking for profits-first policies
    osxx's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 19, 2008
    Location
    houston texas
    Posts
    4,695
    Specs:
    09 MBP 8GB ram 500GB HD OS 10.9 32B iPad 4 32GB iPhone 5 iOs7 2TB TC Apple TV3
    Quote Originally Posted by lifeisabeach View Post
    IMO, I think Apple really needs to buy back all of their stock and go private. Hungry wolves have their eyes on Apple and if like-minded people do manage to get a majority share of the company in time, they will put in place whoever they want so they can sacrifice the company's core values and squeeze everything they can out of it. This is a sad trend, but vulture capitalism is a big problem today. Just look at what happened to Hostess.

    @ MacInWin

    I think Apple also has the right to tell shareholders that they don't want their money, or they should have the right anyway in principle. Besides, judging from a vote on the matter, 97+% of the shareholders agree with Tim Cook. It's probably worth mentioning that hardly any of these people actually loaned money to Apple. That money was loaned out many years ago by others, and the stock is just traded as a commodity these days. If I understand this all correctly, anyway.
    Well said and I agree.

  11. #11
    Tim Cook angrily rejects political proposal asking for profits-first policies
    XJ-linux's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 02, 2007
    Location
    Going Galt...
    Posts
    3,418
    Specs:
    MacBookAir5,2:10.9.5-MacMini3,1:10.9.5-iPhone6,1:8.3
    "Apple CEO Gets Upset When Asked Investment Question by Investor; Turns it into Populist Gold with Rant"

    CEOs don't like to get called on stuff at all, let alone publicly. The investor got what you get in these situations. I don't buy what Cook is spinning as anything more than a good CEO doing his job and capitalizing on a situation. As far as the environment and social issues... when they quit using pollution central and slave labor to drive their product, I'll take their environmental and social consciousness more seriously. Whatever.
    Never judge a man, untill you have walked a mile in his shoes...
    That way you'll be a mile away from him, and you'll have his shoes.

  12. #12
    Tim Cook angrily rejects political proposal asking for profits-first policies
    chas_m's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 22, 2010
    Location
    Victoria, BC
    Posts
    18,940
    Specs:
    Mid-2012 MBP (16GB, 1TB HD), Monoprice 24-inch second monitor, iPhone 5s 32GB, iPad Air 2 64GB
    From what I've read of this thread, did anyone actually catch the *context* of his *actual remarks* or did we all stop reading at the headline/lead?

    He didn't say that Apple wasn't interested in making a profit, nor did he say that investors who are interested in profit should go elsewhere. What he *did actually say* is that not **everything** Apple does is concerned with return on investment above all other considerations -- and brought up the example of Apple making sure that their devices work well for blind and other disabled persons. As for the "go elsewhere" quote, he again didn't actually say that, its a paraphrase. What he actually said was that sometimes Apple invests in things not because of guaranteed ROI but because they were "just and right." His actual quote: "if you want me to do things only for ROI reasons, you should get out of this stock."

    The reason he said that is because the idiot questioner (unsurprisingly from a conservative dumb tank) asked to him pledge -- on the spot -- that Apple would from now on filter everything they do by ROI. Said idiot also had his proposal put on the ballot for shareholders to vote on -- and he didn't manage to get even three percent of the vote. His other question to Cook made it plain he was a climate-change-denier nutcase with an agenda against Al Gore. Again, Cook handed him his rear end and told him to SD&STFU.

    ENTIRELY appropriate answers on both counts, IMO.

  13. #13
    Tim Cook angrily rejects political proposal asking for profits-first policies
    Lifeisabeach's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 30, 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Neptune
    Posts
    7,637
    Chas, I know exactly what was said, and the context. I'm pretty sure everyone else in the discussion does as well. What I'm confused over is why you think we don't?

  14. #14
    Tim Cook angrily rejects political proposal asking for profits-first policies
    chas_m's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 22, 2010
    Location
    Victoria, BC
    Posts
    18,940
    Specs:
    Mid-2012 MBP (16GB, 1TB HD), Monoprice 24-inch second monitor, iPhone 5s 32GB, iPad Air 2 64GB
    Sorry, I was irritated at the poor quality of the reporting I'd seen on the event in question, and that was reflected in the thread title and some of the things said in earlier posts. I meant only to clarify what actually happened as opposed to what most of the media summarized. My apologies to any members here that I offended with my over-caffeinated tone.

  15. #15
    Tim Cook angrily rejects political proposal asking for profits-first policies
    RavingMac's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 07, 2008
    Location
    In Denial
    Posts
    7,763
    Specs:
    4GB Mac Mini 2012, 13" MBA, 15" MacBook Pro OSX 10.7, 32 GB iPhone 3GS, iPad2 64gb 3G
    I think something that is often forgotten is a corporation is not by default a profit producing engine. A corporation is a legal construct whereby people band together and pool their resources, talents and labor to accomplish a common vision. That vision may only be to maximize ROI, but it doesn't have to be. Witness the many non-profit corporations.

    Apple has profit as a major part of its vision, but it isn't the sole goal, and I believe that was the message Tim Cook was trying to get accross.

    EDIT: I wouldn't want to be treated by an MD whose only goal was maximum ROI. The unfortunate truth is most of us have to labor to eat, pay the bills and keep a roof over our heads. If we are truly fortunate we can achieve those ends through laboring at something we find interesting and fulfilling.
    And, I believe we all benefit when we are served by people who would do what they do if they were rich enough to not have to work.
    I've always wanted to be smart, handsome and modest. But, I guess I'll have to be satisfied with two out of three . . .

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Chinese media satisfied with Tim Cook's apology
    By OneMoreThing... in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-02-2013, 01:20 PM
  2. Mountain Lion available tomorrow ~ Tim Cook says
    By TattooedMac in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 07-31-2012, 08:52 PM
  3. Rosetta I wrote to Tim Cook, CEO of Apple
    By karlreed in forum OS X - Operating System
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-22-2012, 10:31 AM
  4. CEO Tim Cook looks to mold a more streamlined Apple
    By OneMoreThing... in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-02-2011, 02:41 PM
  5. Apple's Tim Cook gets his earthly reward
    By the8thark in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-13-2010, 02:23 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •