Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Integrated faster then dedicated graphics??

    Member Since
    Jan 27, 2007
    Location
    *Brisvegas*
    Posts
    5,658
    Specs:
    17 inch 2 GHz C2D imac (5,1) with 3GB DDR2 RAM, X1600 (128MB memory) GPU - OSX 10.6.3
    Integrated faster then dedicated graphics??
    Integrated faster then dedicated graphics??
    Well here is an article that says intel might have just done this very thing.
    Sandy Bridge tests show Intel video beating dedicated GPUs | Electronista

    ****************

    And in other graphics news:

    AMD axes ATI brand for graphics
    AMD axes ATI brand for graphics | Electronista

    So it's true the ATI gpu's are being rebranded to be AMD ones now. I think it's the beginning of the end for the ATI (now AMD) gpus. They used to be very good and have a nice reputation. And now I just don't know what to think.

  2. #2
    Integrated faster then dedicated graphics??
    iggibar's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 20, 2009
    Location
    C-Town
    Posts
    4,071
    Specs:
    Mac Pro 4.1 15" MBP. 13" MBP. 17" PB. Power Mac G5. Galaxy Note 4 160gb*
    What? No more ATi? But I like ATi!! I wonder if apple is going to stick with AMD's lineup, or just switch completely to Nvidia?

    As for the processor's power to gain better graphics results, my friend just bought a core i7 MBP, and the graphics are amazing for it. If integrated graphics are helped this much by the i5's and i7's, Apple should really make them "Pro's" and switch to the fastest and most powerful i5's and i7's you can get!
    “If you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself but to your own estimate of it; and this you have the power to revoke at any moment.” Marcus Aurelius

  3. #3
    Integrated faster then dedicated graphics??
    chscag's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 23, 2008
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    45,216
    Specs:
    27" iMac i5, 3.2 GHz, iPad 3, iPhone 5c, iPhone 6+, 3 iPods, Yosemite
    So it's true the ATI gpu's are being rebranded to be AMD ones now. I think it's the beginning of the end for the ATI (now AMD) gpus. They used to be very good and have a nice reputation. And now I just don't know what to think.
    ATI was bought out long ago by AMD so that shouldn't surprise anyone. As far as the branding of the GPU is concerned, that's all it is. The GPU chipsets will have the same quality only now with a different name.

    What will be interesting though is if this causes confusion when downloading drivers for the newly branded chipsets. Hopefully AMD will have sense enough to keep the old and new separate.

  4. #4
    Integrated faster then dedicated graphics??

    Member Since
    Jan 17, 2010
    Posts
    1,466
    Specs:
    2.8 GHz 15" MacBook Pro OS X 10.7.x & some old Macs
    This is good news but Intel had no other choice other than to improve their performance since they no longer allow third party integrated chips. This will probably mean that we will see i3 Intel chips on the 13" MBP instead of staying with C2D which allowed third party graphics chips.

    Quote Originally Posted by idrinorbarsaku View Post
    What? No more ATi? But I like ATi!! I wonder if apple is going to stick with AMD's lineup, or just switch completely to Nvidia?
    As already mentioned it seems they are just changing the name since AMD has owned ATi for awhile now. Apparently AMD just want the general public to know they own ATi. Based on the comments above it does seems that people didn't know AMD owned ATi.

  5. #5
    Integrated faster then dedicated graphics??
    Chris H.'s Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 03, 2009
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    Posts
    2,633
    When I built PCs with my Dad- all he used were ATi cards, and Intel processors. It looks like that's changing.
     iPad Air 2 - iOS 9 Beta
     iPhone 6 64GB - iOS 9 Beta
     Mac mini Server M10 - OS X 10.10.5
     MacBook Uni L09 - OS X 10.11 Beta

  6. #6
    Integrated faster then dedicated graphics??

    Member Since
    Jan 17, 2010
    Posts
    1,466
    Specs:
    2.8 GHz 15" MacBook Pro OS X 10.7.x & some old Macs
    That's only an issue for integrated cards. You can still use any dedicated graphics card you want with Intel chips unless what you are trying to say is that there is less of a need for dedicated graphics cards with this new integrated performance claim from Intel.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Question about integrated graphics
    By imac5k in forum Other Hardware and Peripherals
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-29-2014, 11:17 PM
  2. 2013 rMBP change dedicated Graphics RAM
    By topman1993 in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-18-2013, 03:57 PM
  3. Integrated Graphics failing? HD 4000.
    By Jackabee in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-12-2013, 02:25 PM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-08-2011, 11:51 AM
  5. Integrated Graphics & External Screen Problem
    By True Bassist in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-21-2010, 07:06 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •