Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
  1. #1
    Survey: Macs Cost Notably Less to Support than Windows PCs

    Member Since
    Apr 09, 2009
    Location
    Ithaca NY
    Posts
    2,073
    Specs:
    13 inch alMacBook 2GHz C2D 4G DDR3, 1.25GHz G4 eMac
    Survey: Macs Cost Notably Less to Support than Windows PCs
    Survey: Macs cost notably less to support than Windows PCs

    Funny that I made those points to people every day as far as owning computers goes.

  2. #2
    Survey: Macs Cost Notably Less to Support than Windows PCs
    TattooedMac's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 19, 2009
    Location
    Waiting for a mate . . .
    Posts
    8,379
    Specs:
    21" iMac 2.9Ghz 16GB RAM & 13"MBP 2.9Ghz i7 8GB RAM 10.10.3, iPhone5 & iPad Air 2 iOS 8.3, ATV3
    Even though the article is short, it is still a good read and sort of puts me at ease. The comfort of knowing in the long run that my Mac will cost me less is music to my ears. The overall up front price of buying one, is negligible knowing that and only that is the the most ill be spending over the life time of my machine ....
    Dont forget to use the Reputation System if someone has helped you out !!!
    Arguing with a zealot is only slightly easier than tunneling through a mountain with your forehead!!!!!
    MoTM ☆☆☆

  3. #3
    Survey: Macs Cost Notably Less to Support than Windows PCs

    Member Since
    Apr 09, 2009
    Location
    Ithaca NY
    Posts
    2,073
    Specs:
    13 inch alMacBook 2GHz C2D 4G DDR3, 1.25GHz G4 eMac
    I've experienced it my whole life.

  4. #4
    Survey: Macs Cost Notably Less to Support than Windows PCs

    Member Since
    Oct 22, 2007
    Location
    Tampa , FL
    Posts
    1,957
    Specs:
    15" MBP Unibody 2.53Ghz 4GB RAM 250GB HD,VERIZON iPhone 4,SIG P238 ,iPad,6th Gen iPod NANO
    Good article. I agree I know several people who are still using G4 macs for everyday use.Heck my Dad' uses his 700Mhz eMac till this day, The only thing it cost him was a Ram upgrade, Not too bad. I don't anyone who still uses a 700Mhz PC.

    another example I just recently picked up a Powerbook 145B from 1993 and it still works perfectly.

    I think the lesson here is you get what you pay for. buy a $499 Dell laptop and maybe get 2 years out of it. Buy a Mac and you could get a decade out of it or more.

  5. #5
    Survey: Macs Cost Notably Less to Support than Windows PCs

    Member Since
    Jan 27, 2007
    Location
    *Brisvegas*
    Posts
    5,658
    Specs:
    17 inch 2 GHz C2D imac (5,1) with 3GB DDR2 RAM, X1600 (128MB memory) GPU - OSX 10.6.3
    This just helps the facts that Apple overall arevery resonably priced computers. Even maybe a little cheaper if the PC support cost is high. Just information we all know already but it's nice to see the rest of the world is slowly comeing to accept this fact.

  6. #6
    Survey: Macs Cost Notably Less to Support than Windows PCs

    Member Since
    Oct 22, 2007
    Location
    Tampa , FL
    Posts
    1,957
    Specs:
    15" MBP Unibody 2.53Ghz 4GB RAM 250GB HD,VERIZON iPhone 4,SIG P238 ,iPad,6th Gen iPod NANO
    Quote Originally Posted by the8thark View Post
    This just helps the facts that Apple overall arevery resonably priced computers. Even maybe a little cheaper if the PC support cost is high. Just information we all know already but it's nice to see the rest of the world is slowly comeing to accept this fact.
    If you look at it PC' are only cheaper because of all the bloatware that comes pre-installed on every PC you buy. You don't get that with a Mac.

  7. #7
    Survey: Macs Cost Notably Less to Support than Windows PCs
    chas_m's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 22, 2010
    Location
    Victoria, BC
    Posts
    18,933
    Specs:
    Mid-2012 MBP (16GB, 1TB HD), Monoprice 24-inch second monitor, iPhone 5s 32GB, iPad Air 2 64GB
    My wife has an iBook G4 (1.25GHz) from Feb 2005, and a Mac mini (Core Duo 1.83) from late 2006. For what she does, she can see absolutely no difference in these models (which is why I'm about to sell the mini).

    The iBook is five years old now and does everything she wants it to do on the internet. There aren't a lot of PCs that can make that claim.

  8. #8
    Survey: Macs Cost Notably Less to Support than Windows PCs

    Member Since
    Jan 27, 2007
    Location
    *Brisvegas*
    Posts
    5,658
    Specs:
    17 inch 2 GHz C2D imac (5,1) with 3GB DDR2 RAM, X1600 (128MB memory) GPU - OSX 10.6.3
    Agreed. My mates white ibook G4 still surfs the net and plays music as well as the day it was new. And the same as my imac from 2006. I can play World of Warcraft on it (plus a heap of other modern games and apps) and get 60 fps on medium settings. Tell me any 2006 PC (with all 2006 parts) that can do that. I dunno of any.

    I think it's just the useful life expectancy of a Mac is like 2-3x that of an equivelant PC. A five year old PC is a dead dinosaur. But five year old macs are still very useful machines.

  9. #9
    Survey: Macs Cost Notably Less to Support than Windows PCs
    Doug b's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jun 22, 2008
    Location
    Forest Hills, NYC
    Posts
    3,343
    Specs:
    15-inch Early 2008; Processor 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo; Memory 4 GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM; 10.7.5
    Quote Originally Posted by the8thark View Post
    Agreed. My mates white ibook G4 still surfs the net and plays music as well as the day it was new. And the same as my imac from 2006. I can play World of Warcraft on it (plus a heap of other modern games and apps) and get 60 fps on medium settings. Tell me any 2006 PC (with all 2006 parts) that can do that. I dunno of any.

    I think it's just the useful life expectancy of a Mac is like 2-3x that of an equivelant PC. A five year old PC is a dead dinosaur. But five year old macs are still very useful machines.
    I really think you guys need to stop exaggerating so much. I speak with friends every day whom are still using older Dells (5 years old) with only two gigs of RAM whom are doing everything they were doing before (surfing, office work, and even now processing photos in Lightroom).

    It really depends on how well YOU maintain your machine. One of my friends actually wants to simply upgrade his RAM to 4 gigs for Lightroom, and use it until the machine ceases to work, period. He says he'll then get a Mac.

    I tossed my PC years ago, but guarantee that given the way I take care of my computers, it would be rockin just fine. I always custom built my stuff, and once a year would reformat my HD and reinstall the OS just to start fresh.

    I do feel that OS X is a lot more reliable than XP, but there's absolutely no reason an XP machine (or Win 7 at this point) should be obsolete if taken care of, after 5 or more years. Heck.. my wife's 10 year old Compaq laptop (which we gave away) is still chugging away, doing basic tasks.

    Doug

  10. #10
    Survey: Macs Cost Notably Less to Support than Windows PCs

    Member Since
    Jul 18, 2009
    Posts
    473
    Specs:
    Macbook Pro 13"
    I agree with Doug here.

    I know people who have Macs that last them only two years.

    I also know people who still have computers running Windows 95 smoothly.

    I also don't really agree with the article. What makes Windows more expensive than OSX? Neither of them come with an office suit for free. MS actually does better in the graphics department as they have Paint for free.

    My HP Windows XP computer has not been upgraded and still runs like a charm...

    Can someone please elaborate how Macs are cheaper than PCs in the long run?

  11. #11
    Survey: Macs Cost Notably Less to Support than Windows PCs
    iggibar's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 20, 2009
    Location
    C-Town
    Posts
    4,071
    Specs:
    Mac Pro 4.1 15" MBP. 13" MBP. 17" PB. Power Mac G5. Galaxy Note 4 160gb*
    That's very funny! I noticed this with my mbp even though it is still only 11 months old! That says something! It still runs the same from the first day I got it! My mbp was my first new modern mac, and I was used to all the other pc's slowing down after just months…you shouldn't have to re-install an OS just to make it run from the first day.
    Thank you apple, you make me happy!

  12. #12
    Survey: Macs Cost Notably Less to Support than Windows PCs

    Member Since
    Jan 27, 2007
    Location
    *Brisvegas*
    Posts
    5,658
    Specs:
    17 inch 2 GHz C2D imac (5,1) with 3GB DDR2 RAM, X1600 (128MB memory) GPU - OSX 10.6.3
    Quote Originally Posted by Doug b View Post
    I do feel that OS X is a lot more reliable than XP, but there's absolutely no reason an XP machine (or Win 7 at this point) should be obsolete if taken care of, after 5 or more years. Heck.. my wife's 10 year old Compaq laptop (which we gave away) is still chugging away, doing basic tasks.
    Basic tasks, on a 10 year old machine? That's nothing. My grandma juat spent 6 years writing her manuscript for her first book. And she did it on a Colour Classic Macintosh. And she had an old Apple stylewriter printer to print it out too. And it worked perfectly. She just finished the book this year. So the computer was 14 years old when she started and 20 years old when it's finished. And mind you this is an elderly person who had little knowledge of looking after computers.

    So my point is 10 years is nothing for basic tasks. Can the 10 year old computer still use the latest OS and software?

    Quote Originally Posted by alexsd123 View Post
    Can someone please elaborate how Macs are cheaper than PCs in the long run?
    Ok here are some articles on the subject. And I'll comment on them after each one.

    Macs vs. PCs: Which is cheaper to run? - Feature - Techworld.com
    This article on it's surface looks rather unbiased. But if you read it they really are comparing the cost of runing a PC only network to the running cost of Macs in a mixed PC and Mac network. Which is not the same really. And secondly they are claiming Apple techs want more salary then PC techs. Which is wrong.

    More good articles which support the Macs are cheaper in the long run.
    PCs Are Cheaper?
    MacKiDo/Myths/cost
    Apple Macs really really are cheaper than Windows machines - MAC.BLORGE
    Distorted-Loop.com Blog Archive Macs cheaper, easier, than PC’s for business use – report
    Powered by Google Docs
    IT pros: Macs cost less to manage than PCs
    Salon: Macs indeed cheaper than PCs | MacNN

    And apart from the articles it takes people a lot longer to install new OS's to PC's then it does Apple computers. PC's have to worry about defragging, maleware, viruses, yearly or mothly OS reinstalls (for those who care about thair PCs), and backing up data is not as seamless as Time Machine or carbon copy cloner. And all of this takes up a lot of time. And time equals money in business. A computer that just works and does it's job on it's own with less mantainence to keep it running in ship shape in the end costs lesss to run.

    Yes some people can really look after their PC's and they can last for a while. But they have to put a lot of effort into that maintainence. And for my Mac at least I'm lucky if I do 2 hours maintinance work on my imac a month. And most of that would be time machine backups while I'm sleeping.

    So my side of the arguement is time spent making sure PC's in a large network or at home take more time to keep running at ship shape than Macs would. And that time spent is money or productivity lost.

  13. #13
    Survey: Macs Cost Notably Less to Support than Windows PCs
    Doug b's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jun 22, 2008
    Location
    Forest Hills, NYC
    Posts
    3,343
    Specs:
    15-inch Early 2008; Processor 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo; Memory 4 GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM; 10.7.5
    Quote Originally Posted by the8thark View Post
    Basic tasks, on a 10 year old machine? That's nothing. My grandma juat spent 6 years writing her manuscript for her first book. And she did it on a Colour Classic Macintosh. And she had an old Apple stylewriter printer to print it out too. And it worked perfectly. She just finished the book this year. So the computer was 14 years old when she started and 20 years old when it's finished. And mind you this is an elderly person who had little knowledge of looking after computers.

    So my point is 10 years is nothing for basic tasks. Can the 10 year old computer still use the latest OS and software?
    No, and 10 year old Macs won't run Snow Leopard either, so what's your point ? Way to be "Mr literal", by the way. When I say "basic" tasks, I mean such things as play movies, music, browse the net, office tasks and use competently coded audio programs that aren't resource hogs. It can still use some audio editing programs too.

    And apart from the articles it takes people a lot longer to install new OS's to PC's then it does Apple computers. PC's have to worry about defragging, maleware, viruses, yearly or mothly OS reinstalls (for those who care about thair PCs), and backing up data is not as seamless as Time Machine or carbon copy cloner. And all of this takes up a lot of time. And time equals money in business. A computer that just works and does it's job on it's own with less mantainence to keep it running in ship shape in the end costs lesss to run.
    I think the real problem here is the type of person who uses a PC and their level of tech education. In all the years I ran Windows, I never had one virus and can recall only one trojan variation, which was extremely well known and spread. I think you got it simply for not having a specific service turned off. As for the rest, I can't disagree with you. It was tedious having to do constant anti spyware and malware scripts, defragging etc..

    I switched because I loathed Vista, and with my switch I gained a lot more than what I thought I'd be getting out of the experience. But this whole argument wasn't about anything we've said. You've totally lost track of the original point, which is that a PC can and will last as long as any Mac depending on the user, and a little bit of luck.

    Doug

  14. #14
    Survey: Macs Cost Notably Less to Support than Windows PCs

    Member Since
    Jan 27, 2007
    Location
    *Brisvegas*
    Posts
    5,658
    Specs:
    17 inch 2 GHz C2D imac (5,1) with 3GB DDR2 RAM, X1600 (128MB memory) GPU - OSX 10.6.3
    1. Yes I was taking what you said literally. My point was just everyone's idea of a basic task is different. And therefore that's a different age of machine that can do everyone's differing idea of what a "basic task" is. You're not wrong with what you said and neither am I. We just have differing opinions on the subject .

    2. I agree totally. It is possible as you have had, to have virus and issue free PCs. It's not that hard to do it if you know what you're doing as you most certainly do. But a lot of people don't. And the rest of that you said there I totally agree with too.

    An above poster just wanted someone to give their opinion on the subject and back it up with sme facts and I tried to do that .

    Mind you I will say some of the newer PCs with W7 are slowly becoming a lot less maintanence heavy. Heck even a few of them just work right out of the box and have for a year or so trouble free (so far) with little time spent on maintanence. I think W7 is really catching up with OS X on this issue.

  15. #15
    Survey: Macs Cost Notably Less to Support than Windows PCs
    SweetCosmicPope's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 16, 2009
    Location
    Baytown, Tx
    Posts
    373
    Specs:
    Late 2009 Macbook Pro 2.26, 160gb HD, 2gb RAM, OSX 10.6; Emac 1.42ghz 80gb HD 2gb RAM OSX 10.5
    Can I say it? I haven't seen it yet!

    Apple Tax my PURPLE BUNNY SLIPPERS!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-25-2011, 07:34 PM
  2. Why do macs cost so much?
    By xj6jaguar1985 in forum Schweb's Lounge
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 08-13-2008, 02:41 PM
  3. Networking with pcs and macs
    By Elephant Inc in forum Switcher Hangout
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-23-2008, 02:27 PM
  4. Can Macs and PCs work together?
    By jnc007 in forum Switcher Hangout
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-06-2006, 04:24 PM
  5. Connecting Windows PCs to Mac PCs through SMB
    By d4rklit3 in forum OS X - Operating System
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-25-2004, 03:30 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •