Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    SilverBlade
    Guest
    Macbooks and a non-intel video card?
    Will the Macbook series (not Macbook Pro) ever get a better video card then the Intel integrated one?...that's pretty much the only reason why, if I ever get a Mac, I'll always avoid Macbooks because their video cards suck, where the Macbook Pro Video cards, are pretty good.

  2. #2


    Member Since
    Jul 22, 2003
    Location
    Hamilton College
    Posts
    6,999
    Specs:
    20" iMac C2D 2.16ghz, 13" MacBook 2.0ghz, 60gb iPod vid, 1gb nano
    Your reason is the exact reason why they will probably keep it this way. You want a powerful video card, then go for the pro series. The MacBook is fine for most people
    Don't forget to use the new User Reputation System

  3. #3

    D3v1L80Y's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 02, 2004
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    12,456
    Specs:
    MacBook
    I would be very surprised if they did get non-integrated video cards. They don't have them now for the same reason they don't have backlit keyboards, a 15" screen and any other feature of the MacBook Pro... they are consumer level machines. These are the big differences that separate the two lines of notebook and likely won't change unless the MacBook Pro gets something "bigger and better" first.:black:
    __________________________________________________
    Posting and YOU|Forum Community Guidelines|The Apple Product Cycle|Forum Courtesy

    mac: a waterproof raincoat made of rubberized fabric
    MAC: a data communication protocol sub-layer, also known as the Media Access Control
    Mac: a brand name which covers several lines of personal computers designed, developed, and marketed by Apple Inc.


  4. #4

    IronMac's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 08, 2004
    Posts
    582
    Specs:
    Mini C2D 2Ghz 8GB RAM, MB C2D 2.2Ghz, MBP CD 2Ghz, 1TB TC, 2 APX, iPhone 4, ATV2, 23in ACD x2
    The ibooks had non intergrated video, crap but non intergrated just the same.

  5. #5

    Zoolook's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 24, 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    2,756
    Specs:
    15" MacBook Pro, i7 2.66Ghz, 8GB RAM, 512GB SSD; iPad 3, iPhone 5
    Quote Originally Posted by IronMac View Post
    The ibooks had non intergrated video, crap but non intergrated just the same.
    Exactly - even my iBook G3 had an ATI R7500, which is probably faster than the Intel G950 in some ways.

    I think it's a shame the MacBook doesn't get an ATI or nVidia card... even an FX5200 would have been better. I'd like to play some games, like Civ IV and Sims II, but still have a small machine (13"). Apple doesn't offer this. Also, there should be no reason why the difference in price between an entry level MacBook and one with e decent video card is almost $1000.

  6. #6

    dtravis7's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 04, 2005
    Location
    Modesto, Ca.
    Posts
    28,962
    Specs:
    iMac 2010 27" QuadI7 OSX10.11, iMac 2008 OSX10.11, MBP Late2011OSX10.11 , iPad Air, iPhone 3GS
    The very last iBook with a Radeon 9550 will not play 1080p video without missing so many frames the video is unwatchable. The Macbook and even Mini with the Intel GMA 950 plays it PERFECTALLY. To me that is a lot more important in a lower priced laptop than whether it will play Doom III at max resolution or not. The Intel Graphics in the Macbook is fine for most uses and people. It's a lot better than some think it is. If you want better, as has been said already, get the Macbook Pro.

    The only gaming laptops that will play the games I play on my PC are Expensive, Heavy and Hot.

  7. #7

    Zoolook's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 24, 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    2,756
    Specs:
    15" MacBook Pro, i7 2.66Ghz, 8GB RAM, 512GB SSD; iPad 3, iPhone 5
    Quote Originally Posted by dtravis7 View Post
    The very last iBook with a Radeon 9550 will not play 1080p video without missing so many frames the video is unwatchable. The Macbook and even Mini with the Intel GMA 950 plays it PERFECTALLY. To me that is a lot more important in a lower priced laptop than whether it will play Doom III at max resolution or not. The Intel Graphics in the Macbook is fine for most uses and people. It's a lot better than some think it is. If you want better, as has been said already, get the Macbook Pro.

    The only gaming laptops that will play the games I play on my PC are Expensive, Heavy and Hot.
    The video playback point is a very good one. However the problem is that the GMA 950 has been deliberately crippled by only allowing it to access 64MB of RAM, when technically it can address 224MB. The reason Civ IV crawls is not because of the speed of the chip, but the RAM it can access, defined by the architecture.

    I am taking it very personally because I play Civ IV on my MacBook and it's really r-e-a-l-l-y s--l--o--w

    Sniff.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. which macbooks have a 9600m video card?
    By woodpigeon4 in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-02-2010, 03:13 PM
  2. Intel GMA 950 Video Card Question
    By langt in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-03-2007, 01:16 PM
  3. Macbooks and a non-intel video card?
    By SilverBlade in forum Schweb's Lounge
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-07-2006, 05:49 PM
  4. Updated Intel Chips for MacBooks?
    By Brigadeer in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-29-2006, 01:01 AM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-20-2006, 08:32 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •