Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Mac Pro Built on Dead-End Tech????

    Member Since
    Nov 09, 2005
    Posts
    142
    Mac Pro Built on Dead-End Tech????
    I haven't seen anyone make mention of this yet, so I thought I would post some thoughts after reading about how Intel has decided to dump support for the very expensive FB-DIMMs. According to The Inquirer (i know I know, but they've been right alot lately)

    Intel's Oakley aprs Bensley will deck FB-DIMMs

    No FB-DIMMs here

    By Charlie Demerjian: Friday 22 September 2006, 07:53
    WE TOLD YOU about Intel's unceremonious dumping of FB-DIMMs a bit ago, but how it was going to start to end was an open question.

    The end point is known, 90% of the platforms will be decked down and relegated to the MP segment, but where to begin? That is called Oakley, the successor to Bensley.

    Oakley is the Xeon DP platform set to debut in Q3/07 or so, and it looks to not have FBDs as standard equipment. An educated guess is that Intel will continue to provide Bensley for a while. We also hear rumours of a Blackford II Duo Core, so I would think Intel is not going to limit options. In any case, now we know the beginning of the end.
    So, with that being said, I wonder if Apple will switch to a different memory type in the future?

    Hmm.....
    1) Powerbook G4 12" 1.5 GHz, iWork, Ilife 06, Logic Pro, Office 2K4
    2) A PC with a bunch of stuff in it.

  2. #2
    Mac Pro Built on Dead-End Tech????

    Member Since
    Aug 29, 2006
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    217
    Specs:
    Powerbook G4 12" 1.5GHz
    With Intel ending support for FB-DIMM, Apple will undoubtedly be forced to use whichever memory technology Intel decides to go with; DDR2 currently and DDR3 in the later future.
    12" Powerbook G4 1.5GHz/512MB/Superdrive/100GB Seagate Momentus 7200.1
    PowerMac G3 B&W 350MHz/1GB/DVD-RW/Adaptec 39160 2X Seagate 36GB 15k RAID0
    Dell E521 AMD X2 4600+/2GB/7600GT/320GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.10

  3. #3
    Mac Pro Built on Dead-End Tech????
    Avid6eek's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 13, 2005
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    350
    This is good news for Mac users. Losing FB Dimms will cut power consumption and increase memory performance.
    Desktop Specs: Core 2 Quad Q6600@ 4.0Ghz | Asus P5E X38 Motherboard | 4GB PC8000 DDRII | EVGA GeForce 8800GTX | CL x-Fi Fatal1ty | 4 x Hitachi 73GB 15,000rpm SAS HDs (RAID 0) | Adaptec 3805 SAS Controller | Dual Sony 16X DVD-RWs | Dell UltraSharp 2405FPW 24" LCD | Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Speakers

  4. #4
    Mac Pro Built on Dead-End Tech????
    Aptmunich's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 09, 2004
    Location
    Munich
    Posts
    9,073
    Specs:
    Aluminium Macbook 2.4 Ghz 4GB RAM, SSD 24" Samsung Display, iPhone 4, iPad 2
    Ah well, at least they aren't using rambus chips

  5. #5
    Mac Pro Built on Dead-End Tech????
    dtravis7's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 04, 2005
    Location
    Modesto, Ca.
    Posts
    28,477
    Specs:
    iMac late 2007 10.11.b4, iMac 2008 10.10.5, Macbook2007 10.7.5, Mac Mini 10.7.5, iPhone 3GS Note 8!!
    Man, I have not heard that name in a long time. Good old Rambus. Intel had a problem shaking them but was glad when they did. It was Rambus the Company who were the bad ones and not the tech itself, but the whole thing left a BAD taste in my mouth for any of it. I am sure if Intel drops FD then Apple will change over to DDR2.

  6. #6
    Mac Pro Built on Dead-End Tech????

    Member Since
    Nov 09, 2005
    Posts
    142
    Quote Originally Posted by Aptmunich
    Ah well, at least they aren't using rambus chips

    My old Dell had RDRIMMS in it...... PC1066 I beleive. But that was years ago.
    1) Powerbook G4 12" 1.5 GHz, iWork, Ilife 06, Logic Pro, Office 2K4
    2) A PC with a bunch of stuff in it.

  7. #7
    Mac Pro Built on Dead-End Tech????

    Member Since
    Aug 29, 2006
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    217
    Specs:
    Powerbook G4 12" 1.5GHz
    Yes, RDRAM was a disaster, but I think the performance problem had more to do with the Pentium 4 not having enough power to take advantage of all the extra memory bandwidth. They were trying to access 1066MHz memory through a 100MHz (and later 400MHz on the Pentium 4) frontside bus, so what could they have expected?

    Rambus's latest XDR-DRAM and soon to be XDR2-DRAM is quite an interesting technology. The problem with RDRAM was that the memory chips had such a high latency that the added clock speed hardly had any advantage at all with PC architecture. You really had to have a specialized application to really take advantage of RDRAM. With XDR/XDR2-DRAM, the memory latency problem is solved and the chips now have latency similar to standard DDR2 modules. Not to mention clock speed has upped to a jaw-dropping 3.2GHz and there's room to ramp up to an amazing 8.0GHz. This is quite an interesting technology for the taker, but you also have to remember there will never be a relationship between Intel and Rambus because of the lawsuit, and AMD has heavily invested in pioneering the future of DDR3 memory modules. If there was a PC architecture (IBM Cell anyone?) that had the power to take advantage of the mounds of memory bandwidth provided by XDR/XDR2, it would certainly be an amazing memory technology. Until then, it will be used for specialty applications that can take advantage of it.
    12" Powerbook G4 1.5GHz/512MB/Superdrive/100GB Seagate Momentus 7200.1
    PowerMac G3 B&W 350MHz/1GB/DVD-RW/Adaptec 39160 2X Seagate 36GB 15k RAID0
    Dell E521 AMD X2 4600+/2GB/7600GT/320GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.10

  8. #8
    Mac Pro Built on Dead-End Tech????
    D3v1L80Y's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 02, 2004
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    12,456
    Specs:
    MacBook
    OMG!!!111!!!!!11

    You mean to tell me that technology doesn't last forever?...

    ...and that sometimes components and things are replaced, updated, upgraded and discontinued... even after a manufacturer has used them in a current lineup??...

    :black:



    Seriously... I would hardly go so extreme as to say that any company is using "dead end tech" in their products. The simple fact is that almost any technology will become obsolete or replaced at some point in its life-cycle. And yes, it isn't unheard of for something to go, as you call it, "dead end" shortly after it is introduced.
    __________________________________________________
    Posting and YOU|Forum Community Guidelines|The Apple Product Cycle|Forum Courtesy

    mac: a waterproof raincoat made of rubberized fabric
    MAC: a data communication protocol sub-layer, also known as the Media Access Control
    Mac: a brand name which covers several lines of personal computers designed, developed, and marketed by Apple Inc.


  9. #9
    Mac Pro Built on Dead-End Tech????

    Member Since
    Nov 09, 2005
    Posts
    142
    Well, given the facts as we know them now, I think "dead end" was the proper term. I doubt Apple had known of Intel's plan to abandon the tech and learned alongside everyone else. But now Apple has a chance here to switch to a less expensive DDR2 option. They could pass that savings to customers in the form of lower prices. Apple would be able to lower the price further to draw in some of those people who are on the edge of buying, but are put off by the high memory prices.

    Not speaking of myself, of course. I intend to get one in January - FBDIMMS or not.
    1) Powerbook G4 12" 1.5 GHz, iWork, Ilife 06, Logic Pro, Office 2K4
    2) A PC with a bunch of stuff in it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 2011 13" Macbook pro, low end or high end
    By bent in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-02-2011, 10:09 AM
  2. How to know if my macbook built in i-sight is dead?
    By goodatflash in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-08-2010, 05:07 PM
  3. Is My Built-In Ethernet Dead?
    By Roshalo in forum Internet, Networking, and Wireless
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-11-2009, 12:46 PM
  4. Built in ethernet dead??
    By 50trimtsi in forum Internet, Networking, and Wireless
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 07-11-2005, 12:25 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •